Trying to attain projections about the future is a tricky business. However, while we don’t have a crystal ball that can reveal the future, we can try to induce trained guess employing present trends that we have observed over the last 12 months to identify areas that attackers are likely to seek to exploit in the near future.

Let’s begin by indicating on our predictions for 2020.

The next degree of false flag assaults This year, we haven’t seen anything as dramatic as the forging of a malicious module to make it look like the work of another threat performer, as was the case with Olympic Destroyer. However, the use of false flags has undoubtedly become an established technique used by APT groups to try to deflect attention away from their activities. Notable instances this year include the campaigns of MontysThree and DeathStalker. Interestingly, in the DeathStalker case, the actor incorporated credential metadata from the infamous Sofacy in their infrastructure, trading covertness for the chance of having their operation falsely attributed.

From ransomware to targeted ransomware Last year, we highlighted the transformation towards targeted ransomware and predicted that attackers would use more aggressive methods to extort money from their victims. This time, scarcely a few weeks has been going on without news of an attempt to extort money from big organisations, including recent attacks on a number of US hospitals. We’ve also watched the emergence of’ brokers’ who offer to negotiate with the attackers, to try to reduce the cost of the ransom fee. Some attackers seem to apply greater pressure by stealing data before encrypting it and threatening to publish it; and in a recent incident, affecting a large psychotherapy practice, the attackers posted sensitive data of patients.

New online banking and pays attack vectors We haven’t seen any dramatic attacks on payment systems this year. Nevertheless, financial institutions continue to be targeted by specialist cybercrime groups such as FIN7, CobaltGroup, Silence and Magecart, as well as APT threat performers such as Lazarus.

More infrastructure assaults and assaults against non-PC targets APT threat performers have not limited their activities to Windows, as illustrated by the extension of Lazarus’s MATA framework, the development of Turla’s Penquin_x6 4 backdoor and the targeting of European supercomputing middles in May. We likewise discovered the use of multiplatform, multi-architecture tools such as Termite and Earthworm in operation TunnelSnake. These tools are capable of creating passageways, transferring data and spawning remote shells on the targeted machines, supporting x86, x64, MIPS( ES ), SH-4, PowerPC, SPARC and M68k. On top of this, we likewise discovered the agreed framework we dubbed MosaicRegressor, which includes a compromised UEFI firmware image designed to drop malware onto infected computers.

Increased assaults in regions that lie along the trade routes between Asia and Europe In 2020, we find several APT threat actors target countries that had previously drawn less attention. We learnt various malware used by Chinese-speaking performers utilized against government targets in Kuwait, Ethiopia, Algeria, Myanmar and the Middle East. We also observed StrongPity deploying a new, improved version of their main implant called StrongPity4. In 2020 we discovered victims infected with StrongPity4 outside Turkey, are contained in the Middle East.

Increasing sophistication of attempt techniques In addition to the UEFI malware mentioned above, we have also seen the use of legitimate cloud services( YouTube, Google Docs, Dropbox, Firebase) as part of the attack infrastructure( either geo-fencing attempts or hosting malware and used for C2 communications ).

A further modify of focus towards mobile onslaughts This is apparent from the reports we have written this year. From year to year we have seen more and more APT actors develop tools to target mobile machines. Threat actors this year included OceanLotus, the threat actor behind TwoSail Junk, as well as Transparent Tribe, OrigamiElephant and many others.

The insult of personal information: from deep fakes to DNA leaks Leaked/stolen personal information is being used more than ever before in up-close and personal attacks. Threat performers are less afraid than ever to engage in active ongoing communications with their victims, as part of their spear-phishing runnings, in their efforts to compromise target systems. We have seen this, for example, in Lazarus’s ThreatNeedle activities and in DeathStalker’s efforts to pressure victims into enabling macros. Criminals have used AI software to simulated the voice of a senior executive, tricking a administrator into transferring more than PS2 40,000 into a bank account controlled by fraudsters; and governments and law enforcement agencies have utilized facial acceptance software for surveillance.

Turning our attention to the future, these are some of the developments that we suppose will take center stage in its first year ahead, based on the trends we have observed this year.

APT threat performers will buy initial network access from cybercriminals

In the last year, “were having” observed many targeted ransomware attacks applying generic malware, such as Trickbot, to gain a foothold in target networks. We have also observed connections between targeted ransomware attacks and well-established underground networks like Genesis that typically trade in stolen credentials. We believe APT actors will start using the same method to compromise their targets. Organisations should pay more attention to generic malware and perform basic incident response activities on each compromised computer to ensure generic malware has not been used deploy sophisticated threats.

More countries applying legal accusations as part of their cyberstrategy

Some years ago we predicted that governments would resort to” name and shaming”, to draw attention to the activities of hostile APT groups. We have ascertained several cases of this over the last 12 months. We think that US Cyber Command’s” persistent participation” strategy will begin to bear fruit in the coming year and contribute other states to follow suit , not least as “tit for tat” retaliation to US accusations. Persistent engagement involves publicly releasing reports about adversary tools and activities. US Cyber Command has argued that warfare in cyberspace is of a essentially different nature, and necessitates full-time engagement with adversaries to disrupt their operations. One of the ways they do so is by providing indicators that the threat intelligence community can use to bootstrap new investigations- in a sense, it is a way of orienting private research through intelligence declassification.

Tools “burned” in this way become harder to use for the attackers, and can undermine past campaigns that might otherwise have stayed under the radar. Faced with this new threat, adversaries scheming assaults must factor in additional costs( the heightened possibility of losing tools or these tools being exposed) in their risk/ gain calculus.

Exposing toolsets of APT groups is nothing new: successive leakages by Shadow Brokers offer a striking instance. Nonetheless, it is the first time it has been done in an official capacity through country agencies. While quantifying the effects of deterrence is impossible, especially without access to diplomatic channels where such matters are discussed, we believe that more countries will follow this strategy in 2021. First, states traditionally would be consistent with the US may start replicating the process, and then, later on, the targets of such disclosures could follow suit as a sort of retaliation.

More Silicon Valley corporations will take action against zero-day brokers

Until recently, zero-day brokers have traded exploits for well-known commercial products; and big companies such as Microsoft, Google, Facebook and others have apparently paid little attention to the trade. However, in the last year or so, there have been high-profile cases where accounts were allegedly compromised utilizing WhatsApp vulnerabilities- including Jeff Bezos and Jamal Khashoggi. In October 2019, WhatsApp filed a lawsuit accusing Israel-based NSO Group of having exploited a vulnerability in its software; and that the technology sold by NSO was used to target more than 1,400 of its clients in 20 different countries, including human rights activists, correspondents and others. A US judge subsequently is of the view that the lawsuit could proceeded. The outcome of the case could have far-reaching consequences , not least of which could be to lead other firms to take legal action against companies that deal in zero-day exploits. We think that mounting public pressure, and the health risks of reputation injury, may contribute other companies to follow WhatsApp’s lead and take action against zero-day brokers, to demonstrate to their clients that they are seeking to protect them.

Increased targeting of network appliances

With the trend towards overall improvement of organizational security, we think that performers will focus more on exploiting vulnerabilities in network appliances such as VPN gateways. We’re already starting to see this happen- consider here, hereand herefor further details. This runs hand-in-hand with the change towards operating from home, requiring more companies to rely on a VPN setup in their business. The increased focus on remote working, and reliance on VPNs, opens up another potential strike vector: the harvesting of user credentials through real-world social engineering approaches such as “vishing” to obtain access to corporate VPNs. In some instances, this might permit the attacker to even attain their espionage aims without deploying malware in the victim’s environment.

The emergence of 5G vulnerabilities

5G has attracted a lot of attention this year, with the US exerting a lot of pressure on friendly states to discourage them from buying Huawei products. In many countries, there exist numerous scare tales about possible health risks, etc. This concentrates on 5G security means that researchers, both public and private, are definitely looking at the products of Huawei and others, for signs of implementation problems, crypto flaws and even backdoors. Any such flaws is obviously receive massive media attention. As utilization of 5G increases, and more devices become is contingent upon the connectivity it furnishes, attackers will have a greater incentive to look for vulnerabilities that they can exploit.

Demanding money” with menaces”

We have visualized several the modifications and refinements in the tactics used by ransomware gangs over the years. Most notably, attempts have evolved from random, speculative attacks distributed to a large number of potential victims, to highly targeted attacks that demand a considerably greater payout from a single victim at a time. The victims are carefully selected, based on their ability to pay, their reliance on the data encrypted and the wider impact an attack will have. And no sector is considered off limits, notwithstanding the promises ransomware gangs constructed not to target hospitals. The delivery method is also customized to fit the targeted organization, as “were having” seen with attempts on medical centers and hospitals throughout the year.

We have also seen ransomware gangs seeking to obtain greater leveraging by threatening to publish stolen data if a company fails to pay the ransom demanded by the attackers. This trend is likely to develop further as ransomware gangs seek to maximize their return on investment.

The ransomware problem has become so prevalent that the OFAC( Office of Foreign Assets Control) released instructions for victims and clarified that paying ransoms could constitute a breach of international sanctions. We construe this announcement as the beginning of a wider crackdown on the cybercrime world by US authorities.

This year, the Maze and Sodinokibi gangs both pioneered an “affiliate” modeling involving collaboration between groups. Nevertheless, the ransomware eco-system remains very diverse. It’s possible that in the future we will see a concentration of major ransomware musicians who will start to focus their activities and obtain APT-like capabilities. Nonetheless, for some time to come, smaller gangs will continue to adopt the established approach that relies on piggybacking botnets and sourcing third-party ransomware.

More disruptive attacks

More and more aspects of our lives are becoming dependent on technology and connectivity to the internet. As a ensue, we present a much wider attack surface than ever before. It’s likely, therefore, that we will see more disruptive attacks in the future. On the one hand, this interruption could be the result of a directed, orchestrated assault, designed to affect critical infrastructure. On the other hand, it could be collateral injury that occurs as a side-effect of a large-volume ransomware attack targeting organizations that we use in our day-to-day lives, such as educational institutions, supermarkets, postal services and public transportation.

Attacker will continue to exploit the COVID-1 9 pandemic

The world has been turned upside down by COVID-1 9, which has impacted nearly every aspect of our lives this year. Attackers of all kinds were quick to grab the opportunity to exploit the keen interest in this topic, including APT threat actors. As we have noted before, this did not mark a change in TTPs, but simply a persistent topic of interest that they could use as a social engineering enticement. The pandemic will continue to affect our lives for some time to come; and menace actors will continue to exploit this to gain a foothold in target systems. During the last six months, there have been reports of APT groups targeting COVID-1 9 research center. The UK National Cyber Security Centre( NCSC) stated that APT2 9( aka the Dukes and Cozy Bear) targeted COVID-1 9 vaccine growing. This will remain a target of strategic interest to them for as long as the pandemic lasts.

Read more: